The argument has stopped, but one child is still holding the toy and the other is standing apart. A grown-up reaches for the quickest visible ending: “Say sorry and give your sister a hug.” A hug may be welcome, but it can’t be required proof that the children are ready to reconnect. Repair is more useful when it addresses what happened and gives each child a choice about contact.

Stop the immediate conflict first

If the children are still yelling, grabbing, or hitting, focus on safety before asking anyone to explain. Move the object out of reach or create space between them, using calm, clear directions. If a child is hurt, attend to the injury and get help as needed. Don’t ask them to resolve the disagreement while one is frightened or still trying to protect themselves.

Once everyone is safer, give them a little time to settle. That may mean sitting nearby, offering water, or allowing quiet in a shared space. It shouldn’t mean isolating a child or withdrawing care. A young child may need help finding words; an older child may want a few minutes before talking. You can say, “We’ll sort out the toy when everyone is ready. For now, I’m keeping it here.”

Describe the behavior, not the child

When they can listen, describe what you saw as specifically as you can: “You pulled the book from her hands, and she fell against the chair.” Avoid calling someone mean or deciding the whole conflict from the loudest account. Ask each child what they need you to know, but don’t force a full retelling or treat it as a trial. If one child is too upset to speak, you can start with the immediate boundary and return to the conversation later.

You might say, “You both wanted the same book. Pulling it made someone fall, so I’m going to check that she’s okay. The book stays with me until we decide what to do next.” If the accounts differ, respond to the part you know: grabbing stopped, the hurt child gets care, and the book is held temporarily. You can keep listening without making a child accept blame they don’t agree with.

Offer repair that fits the harm

Repair can mean returning the book, helping pick up scattered pages, asking whether the other child wants company, or giving space. A verbal apology may help if it’s sincere and specific, but it shouldn’t be a line a child must recite on cue. Offer choices: “Would you like to tell him you’re sorry, return the book, or give her some room while I check in?” The hurt child can decline a hug or conversation. They don’t have to comfort the child who caused harm.

Be clear about the boundary even if the children aren’t ready to reconnect: “You can be angry. You can’t pull things from someone’s hands.” If a child says they don’t want to say sorry yet, you can wait while still requiring a concrete action such as returning the item or stopping the behavior. The point is not to secure a display of forgiveness; it’s to address what happened and prevent the same harm from continuing.

When the same fight keeps coming back

If a repair attempt fails because the children start arguing again, pause and make the next choice smaller. Keep the contested object with an adult, let them play separately for a while, or revisit turns after a break. Don’t make one child hug the other to prove the disagreement is over. If fighting involves injury, threats, intimidation, or a repeated pattern that leaves one child afraid, take it seriously and provide close adult support; don’t rely on sibling negotiation alone.

For this argument, choose one repair action linked to the actual harm—return the book, gather the pages, or give the other child space—and let the hug remain optional.

About our sources, examples and editorial approach →